What, then, do ekranizatoram? It would seem easier than ever:they must, first, free of verbal form reality, this form-cut, and, second, to fix this reality with the methods that are typical for the author. Tricks left in the end, look like punctuation: Bitter adored dash Turgenev - semicolon, Dostoevsky - exclamation points.We, today, we can do the common punctuation, not to offend a holy shadows ... Meanwhile, no reality, download the film Gojitmal
and released on the tools and techniques of the artist, prostonaprosto exists. Dostoevsky's world, devoid of its principles of creation of this world, its rules of conduct in it and the way it decodes the world - a fiction, an absurdity.About the great writer was led to say that it reflects the Toto and Toto. About the movie screen also say that it mirror that reflects it. When the screen is reflected in the mirror of a great writer, in front of us, whether we like it or not, a system of mirrors, where everyone - especially your own.Typist Thomas Mann, restoring the venerable author manuscript of "Joseph and his brothers," said the download the film Gojitmal
and delighted: "Well, at least now you know how it was in reality." Setting the number one. The novel reflected not a parable, and living life. He even closer to reality than a parable: it now looks reduced and download the film Gojitmal
and simplified retelling of the novel.On the contrary. Viktor Shklovsky, download the film Gojitmal
and declared that "not sure that even Thomas Mann was right" when unfolded biblical stories in the form of a multi-volume epic narrative. Never mind the "right" to the task writer or " failed." "The novel is well - writes Shklovsky - but did not require the parable of the narration."He remembers one time that Goethe also pondered such venture, but declined to time, realizing it's not that impossible and unnecessary. Very handy Shklovsky refers both to Tolstoy: Tolstoy's treatise "What is art" specifically warned against such experiments."In the story of Joseph, - he wrote - no need to describe in as much detail as is done now, bloodied Joseph's clothing and housing and Jacob, and the pose and outfit Pantifrievoy wife as she straightened bracelet on her left hand, she said: "Come to me", etc.Because the content of the senses in the story so much that all of the details, except for the most necessary, for example, that Joseph went into the other room to cry - that these details are unnecessary and would have prevented only convey a sense of ... ". Here is setting two: interested in the story of Joseph is not what it seems to be "in fact" and that "the content of feeling." No other reality than the reality of the story, do not exist in nature.
Details, except those that are old author, is not only unnecessary, but superfluous.The same view held Pier Paolo Pasolini, cinematic interpreter of the Gospel of Matthew.Other, less sensitive director is fun and easy to compile from the four Gospels that was "really" would add to their own understanding of new scenes and episodes, flashed a mounting delights game mega plans, rapid camera.Then we have a story to life, and ascension of Jesus Christ retold takimto director.