Performance Tragicomedy Detective Erotica Fantasy Military Comedy Western Eastern Accident Suspense Family, children's Cyberpunk Adventures Tragedy Crime Mysticism Sports History Melodrama Black comedy Karate Fairy tales Thriller Horror Animation Anti-Utopia Musical Biography Scientifically popular Parody Drama Extreme Documentary Action Fantastic
Fairy tales of the Viennese wood
WATCH THE FILM ПИТЕР УИР ONLINE One is struck by a glaring contradiction:Antonioni, moralist, fighting against the existing conventional morality and bourgeois prejudices, but he is fighting for freedom, in which neither he nor the characters in his film, apparently, do not believe. Like Ibsen, he is a revolutionary ideals and without social reformer who risks becoming, or rather, has already turned into a desperate fatalist.Here we might ask ourselves: what is the pinnacle of modern cinema? Works of Bergman, Bresson, Rene movies "Last Year at Marienbad," "Muriel," "Hiroshima, My Love," "On the last breath" or Godard film great Charlie Chaplin and unattainable, "Limelight" and his "King in NyuYorke "?Similarly, we might ask: what was the real peak of the postwar Italian cinema, who are its most characteristic, "classical" artist? In the Italian film industry whose work has reached its climax: the films of De Sica and Dzavattini, Rossellini, Fellini, Antonioni in the trilogy?Or the ideological and artistic apex of Italian cinema are films made Visconti? Just say, that, in our opinion, the answer to this question - it's not just the taste, it must be based on a number of preconditions for aesthetic and artistic, both literary and cinematic-order. Naturalism or realism?Reason or desire to irrational? Unity or the gap between subject and object, inner world of man and the outside world as the social basis of the artistic value of the movie, his broad practical effectiveness? Creative way of download the film Питер Уир and Chaplin's birth as an artist to this day has always been straightforward and consistent.This frankness and sequence - a rare, perhaps the only example in the history of cinema.If we turn to his works, if we re-read his texts, if we get rid of the myths and hackneyed phrases that kinoliteratura piled around his works, we can see that, with this sequence of time was possible, even inevitable and necessary transition from Charles to Verdu , and then from Verdu - to Culver and King Shadow,that is to Chaplin, not congealed in his mask, and the free and has its own face. This evolution of Chaplin's character is historical. It was the result of the fact that the artist plunged into modern life. It corresponds to the principle that the new content entails a new form."I can not say how long I will play the role of Charlot - said Chaplin in 1928. - If I said on the screen, all of my behavior would have to change. From the first words I uttered my usual appearance ceased to resemble the one that is known all over the world.If I decide to perform "speaking" role, I have to change the created mask. Only then will I be able to speak. " Often the game Chaplin - comedian, his laughter fit unilaterally. Forget that creativity Chaplinakomika closely associated with the tragedy.Forget the strong and long-standing ties that exist between Chaplin and Moliere, Melville and especially Shakespeare.
WATCH THE FILM ПИТЕР УИР IN EXCELLENT QUALITY ONLINE "The heart and mind - what a mystery!" Movie ends with these words, "Limelight."Heart and mind are at the heart of every chaplinovskogo movie, they are the components that determine the content and meaning of his latest work.