WATCH THE FILM EROT?C ONLINE
Kafka wrote about this power, which is download the film erot?c
and endowed with a memory of the small nations, "Memory of a small nation is not a nation's memory is shorter than large;therefore, it is more digging in the depths of the material is there. " In a deep and long-term measurement is kompent siruet what it lacks in length.It does not exceed the memory of a great nation in any psihologichnosti or in collectivism, because, "in a small country," everyone gets a legacy of falling out his share, and nothing but this share, it does not have, even if he does not know or even if he does not keep.Communication between the world and the "I" in a divided world and the particles in the split the "I" does not stop. It turns out that all the memory of the world imposes itself if every oppressed people, and all memory of the "I" is at stake in a kind of organic crisis. Arteries of the people to which I belong - or people of my arteries ...Yet is this "I" - not "I" of the Third World intellectuals, not whether it is a portrait of the intellectual who must break with the colonial state, but can only do so by going to the side of the colonialists, even aesthetically, through the art of influence as Roche and Shaheen?Kafka have a different path, a narrow path bordered on both sides with risk: the very reason that "big talent" or personality of a higher order does not abound in the small literature, the author is unable to make individual statements, which would be like fictional stories;but precisely because people do not, the author is able to produce statements that are already collective Tsgdez KinoObrazvremya 544 545 and resemble embryos kakogoto the future of the people and the political meaning of such statements is direct and immutable.The author can be on the side of his more or less ignorant of the community, or be at a distance from it - all the more reason he expresses some potential forces and - even being alone - can be a real agent of the collective, the collective enzyme chemto like catalyst.Kafka's statement about literature is even more true for the film, because he combines a collective destiny. And ultimately that is what is opredet lyayuschim feature of modern political cinema. Filmmaker sees a double- colonized in terms of culture the people:He colonized tales that have come from other countries, but also their own myths, have turned into impersonal nature in the service of colonialism.Therefore, the director does not have to become ethnologist of his people, and himself to invent some political personal stories - for every personal fiction, like any impersonal myth, is on the side of the "masters." That is why we see the Rush destroys myths inside, and Perrault reveals all sorts of fiction, which can come up director.The director is still possible to find a "patron", ie, to take real, not fictional characters, but put them in a state where they took up writing "fiction", "legend", "tall tales." By taking a step in the direction of the characters, but the characters make a step towards the author: a double formation.Fantasy - it is not impersonal myth, but it is not a personal fantasy: the word in action, speech, action, through which a character continually crosses the border, which could separate his personal business of politics, and he produces a collective statement.Danya said that African cinema, in contrast to the Western idea of вЂ‹вЂ‹it, is not dancing, and talking cinema, in which the words negative impact.