WATCH THE FILM IT IS A TERRIBLE DETECTIVE ONLINE
He does this in order to explain to the historical position error Fellini, citing examples of people escape from reality in the last century, when the efforts of the realists and Marxists, on the contrary, were sent to fight for the knowledge of this reality.Lidzani believes that a decisive change in the perception of the world took place in the transition from Hegel to Marx.However, recognizing the enormous merit of Marx in the knowledge of the world and the importance of his discoveries in the field of materialist philosophy, economics and history, I can not, for the love of the truth, neglected, like Lidzani, others who had critically important step in the process of understanding the world - the transition from Hegel to Kierkegaard.As you know, replace idealistic philosophy had two large critical areas - Marxism and existentialism, a lively dialogue in our time is only between these two forms of thinking. This is true, is still an open question, which, of course, can not be resolved in a single journal article.Also wrong to consider only the progressive historical approach to the knowledge of reality, which is not available to those who are running out of life. Wash, article Lidzani there is another very sketchy and controversial passage, from which just creepy:I mean the place where he talks about the so-download the film It is a terrible detective
and called "angelic humility" Dostoevsky and left existentialists.Maybe just lack of familiarity with the works of existentialist makes Lidzani left in such a download the film It is a terrible detective
and distorted way to treat the problem of human loneliness and communication skills, which, in his opinion, may be allowed only story. Absolutely right:people can achieve convergence in the flow of human history, "exploring" those abyss that separate them, but some Marxists, such as Lidzani fail to grasp the real problems of the study of these "gap", which is precisely understood the left existentialists.Of course, it is impossible in a single article even affect such a complex problem. For too long, it would prove that the story in the form in which it is metaphysically understood Lidzani, acts as a kind of deus ex machina, by which to solve problems of human loneliness.I did not want to deny that the joint targeted social and political struggle of the people is the main thread of human history, but the basic critical thinking, which Lidzani could learn from the existentialists, suggests that history itself - is always open problem:it can not be solved in one plan, just as there can be a process of absolute spirit, which she seemed to Hegel.I turn now to what is said about Dostoevsky Lidzani because, I think, a philosophical stoFederiko Fellini tron вЂ‹вЂ‹it become weak just because of one of the most difficult problems it says briefly and superficially. Lidzani appeal to Dostoevsky - is the true nature of all articles, as evidenced by its very title.With strong obtesyvaniya "Idiot" by Dostoevsky the example of some Soviet critics who, now and in the homeland did not have authority, Lidzani coming down in a heap, "Francis, the minstrel of God" and the "Europe 1951". First of all a big mistake in this group include the films "Europe 1951".Let's leave aside the question of what this film Rossellini was frank failure director: in addition, it does not meet the definition of films about angels humility and "idiocy" in the sense of the word Dostoevsky.