The section groups films in directors. Here you will familiarize with biographies and films of outstanding directors. The director – the principal person when shooting. Into the task of the director enters to turn the scenario into a film. And success or a film dip depends on the director. It is possible to tell still that the director is the artist who writes scenarios, plots, game of actors, operation of operators and a great number of other people which are anyway involved in process of creation of cinema. The section acquaints with outstanding directors of the USSR, Russia and everything which films make gold fund of cinema. Having selected the favourite director, you receive the list of its films and can watch movies online or download films. As it was already told, the kinomusorka in a bigger measure represents films of the USSR and the Russian films therefore the section on directors as focuses attention on Soviet, Russian and directors of CIS countries. In this section of a site you will meet Igor Zajtsev, Otar Ioseliani, Leonid Gajdaj, Grigory Kozintsev, Sergey Bondarchuk, Rashid Nugmanov, Sergey Snezhkin, Roman Kachanov, Alexander Proshkin, Leonid Pchelkin, Nikolay Dostalja, Tatyana Lioznova, Stanley Kubrick, Roman Polanski, James Cameron and other remarkable masters of the film.
СМОТРЕТЬ ФИЛЬМЫ ОНЛАЙН
And as soon as the viewer back to a more conscious perception of the film, so it is only natural a desire to take stock of them experienced the power of sensory impressions.This raises the important question of the value of experience cinematic experiences that we have so far left open. Section 3: Composition Chapter 10 Experimental Film Introduction: The two main types of movies The two most common types of films are game and non-game;The second type includes most of the experimental tapes and films of the facts in all their diversity. Assume that the director who understands the specific means of expression movie are free to choose between the game and non-game decision film.He immediately give preference to one of them or reject the idea of вЂ‹вЂ‹choice, believing that both options allow the creation of the film, is equally satisfying aesthetic requirements of the movie?While this question may seem strange, it is the past and now the subject of lively discussion in the press, in particular, the authors prefer the second of the two possibilities. Usually they say that the plot is not compatible with cinematic storytelling.232 Before turning to the subject of rebellion artists "vanguard" against feature films, should perhaps give two statements in the same direction, taken from other, completely unrelated sources. The first belongs to Andre Maurois, is particularly interesting in that it expresses the personal feeling talented writer:"In the theater, which I attended,
and announced the film" Tears of a clown "and posted some fairly good pictures circus arena, clowns, and ride a big ball, and the lion dancers scary, all that was beautiful, clear and full of allusions, some Persian poetry SentDzhona . The next week I went to see this movie.He was unpretentious, completely
and connected, sentimental and banal story. The entire poetic charm promotional shots of the film came from that chosen by chance, they made an arbitrary interpretation.Event shown without too rational motivations, does not require the viewer's sound judgment about it, and thus brings it to the poetic perception.
СКАЧАТЬ ФИЛЬМЫ БЕСПЛАТНО
The only thing that is valuable, really important - is an artist with his torment and his works. Now, in Italy, to our good fortune, finally have some artists who even managed to expose the false legend that the Italian movie can not be a person.Our true cinema - in them, only they and the few other people we do not today tomorrow fervently hope to learn and discover.Bohemian translation Cesare Dzavattini Film and modern people1 Admittedly, not denying the movie in its existing koekakih great merit, they achieved in the first half century of its existence, it has made a lot of people for some of the planet, far removed from our own, people almost perfect, so good that happy endingsfilms made them abundantly shed tears. Meanwhile, people living in this world, the real men, calmly prepare for the world of war. We woke up in the ruins, we spent too little pictures on it to open the eyes of his fellow man and help him to survive, and can be, and to prevent the horrific events.Simply put, the movie is completely bankrupt, has not
and fulfilled its task, choosing the path of MГ©liГЁs and not go on the way Lyumera2 which would be faced with the thorns of reality.And
and based on, essentially, a low and dishonest movie since the days nikelodeonov cultivated in us a desire to evade the court of his own conscience, the direct and decisive answer about his responsibility.With lightning speed, the movie has managed to lead the viewer as far away from himself and with the help of money and talent to make it to the flight enjoyable and lasting.Deserting from their homeland, the viewer feel a citizen of a certain country, hovering in the clouds, which could be heard cries of pain fictional characters on-screen, but where were heard cries of pain from the people with whom he had just pushed in a bus and shops.Once we came out of the dark movie theater and heard the cries of the vendors of newspapers that war began. This meant that one woman took off her hand and threw it on the telegraph wires, and the head of a Paolo Gai landed in a flower pot at number three.We could only hope that others will drop bombs on the roof is not our home, and the house across the street.