Performance Adventures Thriller Melodrama Comedy Parody Musical Military Tragicomedy Accident Eastern Extreme Fairy tales Tragedy Erotica Biography Cyberpunk Mysticism Action Crime Western Animation Karate Horror History Fantastic Family, children's Anti-Utopia Documentary Scientifically popular Detective Drama Black comedy Fantasy Suspense Sports
Fairy tales of the Viennese wood
film Dougal Subsequently, with the publication of archival materials relating to the history of the prohibition of "Andrei Rublev", the list of "amendments" proposed by the State Committee for Cinematography, should be analyzed against the backdrop of the historical concept of "time Rublev "generated for himself a director.Of course, this concept must be considered, in turn, on the background of "time Tarkovsky": any historical thing is created at the intersection of times, and in this sense is a normal discussion. Relating to "Rublev" in the press was a long time enough one-sided.The prevailing view was formulated by Ilya Glazunov. The most recent summary of all of the same stable claims can be found in the speech of the famous mathematician Shafarevich, "Of the films I remember ..." Andrei Rublev. "Surprised me a picture of gloom, dirt, inferiority and brutality, which he draws.In such a life phenomenon Rublev would be impossible and pointless. But it was the epoch of great artists and saints: where do they come from? ". It is easy to notice that the film score, and this time is no taste, and ideological character. The film was not presented at the Cannes Film Festival, after the triumph of" Ivan's Childhood " it would be natural.Before reaching the domestic screen, the film, however, was sold abroad, and the French audience saw his first Russian in 1969. French Distributors also showed it at Cannes out of competition, of course, the film won the prize for criticism two years before the official birthday at home.Tarkovsky too aware of his artistic right, to take the accusations opponents. "I have the audacity to call himself an artist, he wrote to the then chairman of the State Committee for Cinematography Romanov, moreover, Soviet artists. Me directs dependence on design and life itself. As far as concerns the form, I try to look for.It is always difficult and fraught with conflicts and troubles. This makes it impossible to live quietly in a cushy, cozy apartment. This requires me courage, and I'll try not to disappoint your expectations in this regard. "Tarkovsky's films are always stunning difficult for the average perception of novelty.They did not understand the officials, it seemed that they did not understand and the audience. In fact, Tarkovsky was always "his" faithful and devoted to his audience, as it happens, "your" reader in poetry. But time passed, and the cinematic process in general "catch-up" of the director, his paintings are made available and even "cash".Their shocking novelty dissolved in the general course of the movie. The most amazing thing that took its place in the current filmmaking, they have never been robbed them how often this happened with ribbons, imposes "discovery", which were immediately snapped up all cinema. To do this, too Tarkovsky author their belts:novelty of his transient, "self" is constant.
film Dougal 69 To paraphrase an old Latin proverb: "Sua fata habent libelli", it can be said that "films have their own destiny." "Andrei Rublev" was released on October 19, 1971.