Detective Parody Melodrama Scientifically popular Horror Thriller History Eastern Tragicomedy Documentary Fantasy Performance Animation Musical Comedy Sports Crime Fairy tales Suspense Fantastic Erotica Drama Action Military Family, children's Mysticism Accident Black comedy Biography Western Karate Tragedy Adventures Anti-Utopia Cyberpunk Extreme
Fairy tales of the Viennese wood
LOOK ONLINE Pavlenok not pacifism, and futility heroism of our people in the war. And so it can be read. Orlov I think kakihto things we just keep back here. Taking the style of this picture, its language and images that need to be made in this picture of ideological clarity - that is what is at stake.download the film F?sica o qu?mica and Begin with the first kadragipnoza bewilderment. What is it? Hutsieva We tried to remove it, but it did not work. It is put into the style of the picture. Orlov Maybe in the style it brings, but there are other considerations. From the frame to the scene with the author ... I do not understand how it fit in with the beginning. Well, even though I can not understand:she washes her head, falls ceiling, lots of things I do not understand, but let it remain, the language of the director. Although I see in this strained, artificial, contrived. The first half, compared to the previous version, lined up, but from the moment in the film chronicles everything starts to dawn.Perspective on this episode of our history is very subjective, for me personally unacceptable. Episode with the military director with abnormal debilomvoenrukom directly mounted from reaching ragamuffins. If we run this script, you need to seek clarity - and the conceptual meaning. Evangelistic moments - "to whom an angel appeared in the form of a burning bush?"And others. We have separation of church and state, and the methods we have other evidence - not evangelistic. TARKOVSKY question is not only to Pavlenko and Orlov: where is the number of complaints to me? As can be suspected in me so many ideas that I want to push through in the movie? Where such a relationship?I do not believe such a perfect picture. But I do not consider it fair that I do not do it. This is unfair. Pavlenok My claim is not at all to the author and to the film. Perhaps, it would be first to praise, and then make a claim. But we do have a point. The main requirements for the film were not implemented.What was the best film - it is. It is not about how to remodel the whole picture, its style, reshape Tarkovsky under Shukshin. These three interventions in the picture. I'm talking about a film, and not about the director Tarkovsky. I have no complaints about him. SIZOV With all that said Pavlenok and Orlov, I entirely agree.I wonder why such a disrespectful and disregard for our opinion? I ask for the tenth time: make another chronicle of the Soviet army. God bless her, with the style, let it be as it is. But to show the Red Army in this way - the politically incorrect.
LOOK ONLINE Why do not we see a movie that has been declared in the script, and the other?I can quote your scenario: a victorious conclusion of the war, the fate of the heroine, has passed through all the trials ... Nothing has changed in essence. Only entered the scene with stratospheric balloon, cut a bit of military instructor. But it is also necessary to reduce, not to degeroizirovat military instructor after his feat. Chronicle needs to be cleaned, the repackaging.We have to show that the victory of the Soviet Army saved the world, it is common knowledge.