" Whether this should be understood to mean that, according to Bergson, the cinema is only a projection and reproduction of continuous and universal illusion?What if the people at all times to make a film without knowing it? But then a lot of questions. And the first of them is: is the illusion of reproduction, among others, and how to fix it? Can one of the artificial nature of the means used to draw a conclusion about artificiality and the result?After all, cinema works with photograms, that is, with fixed sections, and is twenty-four images per second. But, as often seen, he shows us not photograms, and average image to which movement is not download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and imposed, to which it does not adds:movement, on the contrary, belongs to the average image as an immediate reality. It seems that exactly the same things and the natural perception. But this illusion is corrected to the perception, because of the conditions that make it possible for the perception of the subject. But in cinema perception correction 'В«L'evolution creatriceВ», p. 753.We quote Bergson texts on so-download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and called "the centennial edition", in parentheses denote the pagination of modern editions of each book. 42 Gilles D, 43 ele'z KinoObrazdvizhenie it possible synchronous appearance of the image, but the viewer sees the displayed unconditionally.In short, the movie does not add to the image of the movement, and gives us directly obrazdvizhenie. Despite the fact that it gives us a slice, the slice that is mobile, it is not a download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and fixed slice of the abstract movement. Again, very interesting, that Bergson, we can say, discovered the existence of these movable sections, or "obrazovdvizheny."And he opened them up to "Creative Evolution," and before the official birth of the film - in 1896, the book "Matter and Memory". The opening of "obrazadvizheniya" perceived outside the natural perception, was a wonderful discovery of the first chapter, "Matter and Memory." It should be assumed that ten years later Bergson forgotten about him?Or he gave some illusion, which turned the idea of вЂ‹вЂ‹the things already at its origin? It is known that things and people are forced to "hide" download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and doomed "hide" before the manifest. How could it be otherwise?After all, they are cropping up among many, in which previously were not included, and therefore, not to be download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and rejected, to bring to the forefront the qualities of the set, which they download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and retain.So the essence of things never seen in her appearance, but always - in the "middle" of its existence, in the process of its development, after her powers grow stronger.And that Bergson knew better than anyone else, because he transformed philosophy, raised the question of the "new" rather than the question of eternity, for example, he download the film Frygtelig lykkelig
and argued that new life could not have come at its source, as the first life had to imitate matter ... Is it not the same things, and with the cinema?Is cinema in its early years was forced to simulate natural perception?