and others - see the beginning of the sound era motive in the movie that the movie itself has run into a dead end its features using labels on the screen. Fourth - it believes that simultaneously connect several reasons.Fifth - remain convinced that the sound on the screen has been involved in a desperate attempt to rescue from bankruptcy of one of the American companies - as a last resort. Perhaps all of these circumstances came together and worked as an explosion at one time.But with all the variety of opinions, it seems to us that the coming of sound in cinema was not only due to external causes, but also to improve the internal needs of the art of the screen.There is a sixth point of view - the sound was drafted into films for the purpose of Let us love the film
, and provide the greatest natural events on the display screen, the requirement to bring your story in moving pictures to a real representation of the human about the world. On the screen - like in real life! But not only this.By the time the audience and filmmakers, new complications and the need for deepening the content of films. Oddly sharpens Eisenstein to pass via mounting frame political slogans - did not happen. He acknowledged the failure to communicate abstract concepts by means of image matching.The cinema at the time, we can say, to some degree to exhaust the potential of deepening the analysis of the phenomena of life. In the literature and the theater, he was already hard to keep up. And he claimed the lead.Sound and spoken word, and promised a more complete disclosure of finer life, social phenomena, human psychology, threatened to significantly enrich the palette of expressive means of cinema. Thunderstorm, but no more. The sound came on the screen, and the camp has split filmmakers.It split into those who resisted in every way, and those who vsemifibrami soul welcomed its successful march through the screens. For many directors and actors especially the victory over the mute sound film turned into a tragedy. They are not able to adapt, regroup and continue to work in the new system, the aesthetic nature of the screen.Great Chaplin before the end of his days and could not enter the temple of sound film, left to stand, just crossed its threshold. For a split to sound rejection from the great filmmakers had good reason. The first sound film is not shining artistic merit.And at first prediction came true Eisenstein, Pudovkin and Alexandrov, released them in a manifesto titled "The Future of sound movies," the director to use the sound will follow the path of least resistance - only direct synchronous, not looking for artistic merit of their works.
.And so it happened. The first years of sound film marked the only significant fact - the hero on the screen in sync with his voice says. This stage of development of the movie and named - the era of "talking movies".Prior to that, the audience thirty years watching the actors on the screen and documentary characters opens his mouth, never heard their speech, but only saw them waving their arms.