Anti-Utopia Detective History Comedy Documentary Action Performance Horror Extreme Biography Suspense Erotica Western Tragicomedy Cyberpunk Fantastic Fantasy Crime Thriller Adventures Mysticism Parody Tragedy Scientifically popular Military Karate Animation Musical Accident Drama Melodrama Sports Black comedy Family, children's Eastern Fairy tales
Fairy tales of the Viennese wood
I think the reason that I underestimated Charlie, that in those days the scene was a lot of first-class comedians. I've seen them all and all worked in vaudeville. By the time Charlie did not seem funny to me Will Rogers, Willy Koller, Bert Williams, Frank Tinney and some others.Later, I was always puzzled when people talked about the similarity of our characters. In my opinion, between them from the very beginning was a fundamental difference. Charlie - tramp tramp with philosophy. He was charming, but he could steal, if you turn the opportunity. My little boy was working and honest.As an example, let us assume that each of them wants a costume that I saw in the shop window. Tramp Charlie admires him, Pick Pocket, is 10 cents, shrugs and leaves in the hope that the next day he was lucky with money. He steals money, if there is no other way to get them, or completely forget about the suit.But my little just admiring the suit and did not find the money, would not steal them. Instead, he will try to Let us love movie watch online in excellent quality and figure out how it movie download Let love and make money on the purchase. Lloyd's character was different from Chaplin and mine.He played a mama's boy that surprises everyone, including himself, wins in impossible situations and at times finds the lion's courage. Lloyd seemed more often acrobat than a comedian. But no matter what he was doing on the screen, always get more than good. For many years, the three of us did not know failures.Yes, none of us had any failures for all the "Golden Twenties". Nothing but great success worldwide. Box office feature films Chaplin reached three million dollars each; Lloyd - two million; my - between a half and two million dollars.And it is in those days, when the theaters were earning only a tiny fraction of what is now earning. As I said earlier, dumb comedy is often superior to full-length films made the most popular romantic Hollywood stars. If we did dvuhchastevki, theater owners put them in front of full-length program.This was one of the reasons for my desire to shoot more movies like those Roscoe successfully done to "Paramount". It seemed obvious that the profits from feature films will increase, but I also believe that Joe Schenck - a shrewd businessman and knows what he is talking about.Charlie Chaplin and Harold Lloyd at the outset were more nimble businessmen than I am. They soon became millionaires, who produced his own films and control the screen of law. They still retain them.This means that Chaplin and Lloyd can Let us love film and earn new state every time the lease or sell the rights to their old silent films. Nobody knows exactly how much money did Chaplin in his paintings, perhaps even himself, Charlie.The reason is that there is no way to calculate the cost of their production. However, it is no secret how much Lloyd brought his films. Each cost from 300 to 350 thousand dollars. Distribution of costs about 35% of the two million box office, that is 700 thousand dollars.