Today we have learned well that "the technical nature of the photos, movies, radio and television" is not an obstacle for the solution of artistic problems "and even in a download the film Heirs
and broad sense," the technique as such, taken by itself, is neutral with respect to art, and he is not hostile ".This, of course, a lot of progress, but with download the film Heirs
and unenclosed area behind the shoulders. Let's be frank: heavy industry film and television will not stay in its designated fragile twig family tree art. One of two things:or foreign, in the desperate hope of vaccine for unprecedented results, or, who knows, the tree does not grow as it seemed, maybe even back up? One day in my editorial board came manuscript interpret adequacy problem in art.It was about how the image of life means different arts is life itself. Ballet and music, of course, were not adequate. Sculpture and Painting - more but not much. Literature and theater - is significant.But the most relevant, of course, the movie looked and T in the last chapter the reader waiting for a stunning conclusion: they, film and TV, as the crown of the artistic development of humanity, now do all the other art redundant.Yes, if a movie camera in the hands of a caveman, history of art and limited to this - he, poor fellow, not have thought to work hard on my art with stone.In the course of the study authors rather ingeniously confided adequacy kinozrelischa many different studies, both domestic and foreign. Psychological experiments on perception download the film Heirs
and alternated with those questionnaires and interviews.For example, the audience his views on a certain issue before watching the movie and after Р°РіРёС‚Р°С†РёРѕРЅРЅРѕРїСЂРѕСЃРІРµС‚РёС‚РµР»СЊСЃРєРѕРіРѕ. It turned out that a few noteworthy points picture of the world has changed for him. Similarly affected and feature films, even in matters that they are not specifically dedicated.All this is quite apt and unexpected kinovospriyatiya reveal the mechanism, but with the old, chauvinistic against other arts to: cinema, film, and just a movie, yes even TV! Only once they can personally show how the e a n n s th person on this street, then why all the other arts?Books, of course, this does not happen. Sverkhzadacha devalued material. This person on this street? Certainly not! Take the streets in Italian films. Did they look like? Perhaps you can find the same back streets of Rome, appearing, for example, "Eclipse", "sweet life" or "Akkatone."They are "adequate" to each other, not to mention the "adequacy" of their subject images? Replied: Of course, every artist has its own "value" that is, their understanding of their own, it uses the part of "adequacy", which suits him.But the film gives it to him in the order, while the literature has to do a very small degree of it. Just the thing - how short- sighted, wasteful use as writers even modest opportunities literary adequacy!When Nastasia page after page describes the points excited endless monologues and every novoprishedshy respectfully waiting to make his own, too many hours, oratorical word - What kind of value?