In conjunction movie
Absolutely not. I figured out all the words that comes out all right, but the mask say different, in that all a misunderstanding.When we say that we more acceptable Theatre Gozzi, let him razfashist, to hell with it, when we say that we take this method mostly before the reception, which offered Goldoni, we are not talking about the masks that get into your head on, we We are talking about the traditional masks further - pass and obscure text in the transcript.When Carlo Gozzi insistently wanted resurrect this truly theatrical mask - a mask folk, folk comedy logically gave him the opportunity to put forward a new dramatic formula. Here's the thing. It is only interested. What's that - a step forward or a step back? This is - a step forward. Despite the fact that Gozzi:based on traditional techniques, it takes them a newer, newer shows. And look - why not Goldoni, Carlo Gozzi why? The practice itself has shown that we are on our stages for new advanced, avant-garde scenes do not see any play Goldoni, but we see, for example, "Turandot."What does this theatrical mask, traditional mask - or gave Vakhtangov enabled to maneuver freely in a show of her new relationship to new phenomena of our life? Helped as a theatrical fiction - has helped. And here we are because of their traditional masks and take, that's why we love. "The Love for Three Oranges" - Prokofiev.When I saw this thing resumed at the Bolshoi Theater, I said, "What's the stupidity, not the director thought: here." There, remember, there's a scene - a dispute between different theatrical trends, and no one at the Bolshoi Theatre has thought that it was necessary to take only the theatrical formula and give us a modern literary struggle.This would be relevant to the living tissue. 235 Well, we must reject Gozzi? No, we have to thank him that he has given such a scenario, the material on which we could create a truly modern theater. Well, I was interested in the mask as such interest as a symbol?No damn good, this approach to the issue - I was interested in analysis techniques. Now the attitude towards theater epochs. We must not forget that we are interested not only theater commedia dell'arte, - was mentioned here, although not directly the word has been called, a farce that reflects the term "grotesque" and so on. D.Opyattaki as there is an opening of the term as it looks for words that wording? Meyerhold in the wording confuses the hell, but it does not matter, it's not that. In my book there is a special article on the booth. film in tandem
.We had to throw a lot in the room, which has long been under lock and key, but at the same time, it is sometimes unlocked so there could still be anything should discard completely unnecessary. But why it was necessary to take a farce? Because it was done in the period of the theater imitators:When imitation reigned in the imperial theaters and had a healthy start to oppose him. So grotesque arose not as full of the Leonardo da Vinci and Goya. This failure definition.While it may be, Leonardo da Vinci and here In conjunction movie watch online in excellent quality
and call, but you can call and beds.