"Juno and the Peacock" was put to the Irish actor.I must admit that I did not want to take the job, because, although it re-read the play several times, I could not imagine her on-screen equivalent. The play itself is great, and I liked the story, and mood, and characters, and a mixture of humor and tragedy.By the way, I had in mind O'Casey, when put in the "Birds" scene in a cafe, where a drunk heralds the end of the world. I shot this piece with all its my imagination, but the results did not bring me creative satisfaction. Reviews of the film were the most favorable, but I felt download the film Noah's Ark
and ashamed because of this movie had nothing to do.Critics praised the picture, and I had the feeling that I had committed a dishonorable act, stole. However, I have kept review, signed by James Agee, which appeared in the "chatterbox" in March 1930. It says: "Juno and the Peacock", in my opinion, almost a masterpiece. Bravo, Mr. Hitchcock! Bravo, "Irish pleyerz" and Bravo, Edward Chapman!This is a great picture of the British. "But I understand your reaction and because critics often praised the film for its literary, not cinematic merits. Reverence authority O'Casey has undoubtedly download the film Noah's Ark
and created your shyness before the translation of literary works on a large display language.You have quite a few adaptations, but, as a rule, they all - screen version of light entertainment novels that are easily treatable in your hands, turning into a Hitchcock. Many of your fans are dreaming, you refer to a film adaptation of the great classics, such as Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment".For this, I will never take at least because "Crime and Punishment" - is someone else's achievement. A lot of talk goes on how Hollywood directors victimized literary masterpieces. I will not reproach in this! I'm doing so. I read the product only once, and if I like it in principle, I forget about the book and start making movies.Today I could not tell the story "The Birds" by Daphne du Maurier. I read a short story once, and very quickly. The author takes 3 4 years to write a novel, a whole life. And then someone turns everything in it on its head. With him are busy professionalytehnari, reveals contender for the "Oscar", a poor writer completely forgotten. Painful sight.Therefore, you never take for "Crime and Punishment"? And even if it came from, nothing good will come of this idea would not leave. Why not? Dostoevsky's novels are very wordy, and each word has its own function. This is so. Theoretically, a masterpiece - it is something that has reached the ceiling of perfection, which gained the most appropriate form. Watch the film Noah's Ark in excellent quality online
. Exactly.And that is equivalent to translate the novel in the appropriate form, replacing the written language of visual, need to rely on 6-10-hour film. Otherwise, not worth to take. I agree. What's more, your style and the nature of suspense games require constant over time - compress it or, alternatively, by stretching.Your approach to screening is radically different from the usual. The ability to download the film Noah's Ark
and speed up or extend the time - the first requirement of the director's skill.