So it was in the fifties. Sounds from the stage, "the inevitable hypocrisy."Later this hypocrisy is download the film Patrol
and reinforced by stronger, and we witness such a performance, such as "Power of Darkness" g. Thick, from which spectators ran out of the drama theater under the wing of farce and theater of miniatures.If the elements of continuity, encircling a number of theatrical generations have come to you by the hunchback bridge, which has spread from coast to coast line of the rainbow, without any support in the middle.If you, gentlemen, have inherited only the manner slovoproiznosheniya that gained strength in the exercises on the texts theaters download the film Patrol
and Pushkin, Gogol, Lermontov, Ostrovsky. Then I would not have so long to dwell on occasional point performance Dec. 2, 1859.Your immediate predecessors have spoiled the beauty of the bridge, they break in the line of the rainbow: they lowered another "bull" in the middle, they lowered him into the jungle bases of household theater. What is this maze of domestic theater?Those freewheeling like "visiting foreigners, representing the public his notebooks, which made strange, strange speech, describing wondrous, strange manners ...". This - "writers of the national life." They are the ones who are "specially devoted himself to play in the life of literature."In the life of the theater arts effective zhanrizm contrary to any notion of art, but rather the public who came to taste. Potekhin, in favor of the public, in the play "The court of human - not God" to come down to the type of Rusakov genre.Is not that right, and sent down to the genre Levkeeva image Barbara, portrayed her in appearance, a woman degrees below their position daughter of a wealthy merchant's wife? Unbeknownst to myself, I went to the patient on the way of life that still does not cease to be an issue.But do not you think, gentlemen, that never-ending debate on domestic theater it would be easy to break the deadlock, if any living creature ever opened the only sensible contending that difference, which conclusively found Apollon Grigoriev, placing Ostrovsky outside the circle of genre painters like Potekhin and Grigorovich.But you notice, gentlemen, - The present-day advocates of domestic theater Ostrovsky stubbornly dragged back into the circle. Is it because our debate on domestic Ostrovsky infinite? Your attention, I will propose only two small fragments of the assertions A. Grigorieva Ostrovsky: 1) "His types - not a genre, not a specialty of life, not men, not women;Although the places that need it, guys, even specialty: the drivers, all sorts of women: women Haldia, plakuschie women - are at it with his peculiar physiognomy. Look online
. He's the Russian people and Russian women in their most common definitions, in their essential features are as types, not as a genre.