FILM THE DIRTY DOZEN: NEXT MISSION
"There are people who want to live each year of his life, his every day as if for two - at the highest seal!"- Pathetically exclaims the announcer in the finals of these paintings, stressing that" the so-live "heroine or hero. Perhaps komuto seem that errors such pictures - in a bad narration. And if you write it download the film The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission
and again ...It's no secret that for the mounted films sometimes fall short at the last moment by resorting to spasateleyliteratorov. This fact alone makes you wonder: what is the role of narration in contemporary documentary film?The problem forced the speaker to re-attract attention due to the simultaneous formation of poetry and film, especially with the development of "live" TV journalism.The appearance of the home screen, standing figures commentator, reporter, interviewer pushed into an irreversible past the time when the announcer was the sole authorized representative of the studio in the frame, and such words as "I" and "I think", were excluded from the display prostonaprosto lexicon.Art impersonal reading our eyes lose their privileges - to change the way the leading programs, the nature of their appeals to the viewer. It has long been seen: we are interested in not only what is said by a man from the screen, but that he is as a person.Personalization of journalism - whether in live TV or in a movie - not a new "form feed" material, but the possibility of a different approach to the reality of a scale to measure it. Manner of presentation, intonation - there is only the outer side of reform.Chronicle the nature of the image, as a rule, it is organically related to the narration, the subjective is the author comment "not prizhivlyaetsya" to portray. Every time you try to link them, we meet with a "barrier incompatibility". And it is not in how the written narration.Actually, the problem of the speaker - no problem text.His presence means a unit in relation to life events and characters, in which the author's personal involvement and spontaneity of his relationship to the events of the camera behind the scenes, and the behavior of the participants of the survey adheres to their function or role, which, in essence, is the subject of display.The thing is, that between the hero and the documentary chronicler of existing, known distance. This distance is maintained in cases where the hero himself provided "vote." And it can not be overcome until the documentary will not be able to open a live chat with her companion - a live chat. "What is your dream?, "" What is happiness? "," What do you think the most important thing in life? ". How many times we are witnessing how the creators filmovanket like playing giveaway with his characters, to the questions that people ask themselves all his life, he offered to answer directly from the machine. Look online
. There is the worst kind of dramatization - the game of candor."Your immediate dream?" - "My dream is to get the nearest degree, master the language of Urdu, to overcome their shortcomings." Shift with meaningless answers from vigorous interviewer questions, participants programs and movies often behave like that, they think is expected of them.