"Miracle in Milan" "Miracle in Milan" chose a different path - the path tale fiction.After some time
and elapsed after the first viewing, you can give a critical assessment of this quiet film that caused such a heated debate, to be honest, not always impartial, for some critics fell for hook debate that goes beyond art.We do not want to say here that the content of the film is too little to give him aesthetic appreciation, and just want to repeat the idea that, perhaps, everyone is sick, as invariably the chorus in some popular songs:content of a work of art is not something external, but something far more profound, which is achieved by the form, and the only genuine expression of the content. The plot, plot, plot, as well as acting, editing, photography, only the technical elements and components to be evaluated as such.I want to say that the output value of "Miracle in Milan" from the analysis of individual episodes, finds the director and screenwriter of gags - then run the risk of arbitrary and abstract reasoning;exactly the same as if we
and assumed taken separately mounting frames or a rhythm, you could get lost in the analysis of "technology", having failed to find the art, and with it the real content.Going on such a wrong way, everyone - depending on your mood, sympathy, political and moral beliefs - could evaluate the film as he liked, finding in it something to support his argument.Thus, some have defined it as a communist, even more so - entirely Soviet, others have found that, on the contrary, it is the beginning to the end of a deeply Christian spirit, while others saw it as anarhoreaktsionny bourgeois compromise.As we see the opposite opinion, quite different, but they are out of the artistic film score, on the other hand, all of them - if they take a false premise - can equally be supported by precise and specific examples.We are perfectly able to interpret the fact that the police are at the disposal of the rich man IOBC as condemnation of capitalism, which uses self-dealing power of the state, is in possession of his keys to oppress the poor, as well as we can see the Christian spirit in many actions or Toto same state asocialrequirements homeless continue to "occupy" the land on which scoring gusher.
скачать фильмы бесплатно
We ask to give us a major writer, we do not get him to sit every day, even if it happens in the studio as it is Twardowski in the "New World" ... but let directs repertoire.We think that the film studio "Mosfilm", which is held annually for his paintings covers a billion viewers - a decent place for the writer. If a writer - a servant of the people, then there is what to serve our great nation.Do not forget that each of our picture several months serving as many viewers as the theater - for a hundred years, a century! This is evident from a simple calculation. Theatre capacity - about a thousand people, two hundred fifty - three
and hundred performances a year - is the maximum three hundred thousand spectators each year. Thirty million for one
and hundred years!This is exactly the number of viewers who watch a painting medium success. And I think that the writer, a servant of the people, you can go to work in the studio in order to help create a better picture for our audience. We help our people build communism.I am convinced that the Writers' Union will help us, the employees of cinematography, to do his duty in this vast, majestic case. Art for Young Go to the cinema and see who comes out after the next session. Is young.Look at almost any filmmaker, well at least that's this thick stack of letters, which now lies before me. The letters of the young. Cinematography - one of the youngest art, but he was still young and the fact that it is a favorite art youth.Old age is, of course, wiser, but oddly enough, the most subtle and wise judges paintings were and will be the young people - those who live cinema and brought up on it. I sometimes envy the writer.Of course, no book can be with such a great speed to collect fifty million readers how to collect fifty million viewers a picture, but the book - a good book - the ability to impose gradually "flare up" in time. And "The Quiet Don" is now living as if it were written yesterday.And the picture, even good, by two to three decades, it is certainly aging. This property of the young art. All that the young must continually updated.