The most perfect piece quite finished playwright Lermontov. Whatever was said, and Lermontov as a stage master is not recognized. Is kakienibud conditions prevented to recognize it as such? Yes, many. Apparently, a lot.Lord few carefree about the literature did not want to recognize the theater of Lermontov something independent and whole and, most importantly, significant. Academic critics seemed drama Lermontov almost commentary to the main motives of his poetry. Not more.The actors have not seen the full significance of AMD Lermontov, not finding them for yourself enough winning roles. Who would argue?Indeed, in France, for example, the success of its romance, that is, representatives of romantic tragedy and drama, had that front for two centuries in the French scene was dominated by classicism, and even in the face of such masters as Corneille, Racine, Voltaire.The emergence of romanticism in France would have been inconceivable without the continued existence of classicism. Romanticism - on stage - the denial of the basic rules of the Cartesian aesthetics Code Boileau «L'art poetique». Where to specify in Russia our Corneille and Racine we? Lomonosov? Sumarokov? Yakov Borisovich Knyazhnin, enjoyed stories Pietro Metastasio? Ozerov?Maybe August Kotzebue, plays which flooded the capital and the provincial scene in the first three decades of the last century? Or, perhaps, right gentlemen evolutionists who say how? in Russian poetry of Pushkin alpha and omega in the present and the future? Or maybe, in the drama Ostrowski?If the French theater could say about the tradition, when the classical period layered romantic period, could speak about the Russian theater full of their tradition? However, we are ready to welcome the brave who will say that we had no tradition. Do not just say you:in the thirties began to be like deus ex machina, originated without any preliminary leaven of Russian theater, which withered, who had not managed to flourish, the only truly, deeply theatrical, amazingly brilliant theater, which no one wanted to admit, no one wanted to take only all rejected.Is Pushkin Russian theater began, to which he did not have and which has been so cruelly overshadowed by the new that was made willingly, but for a long time kept the Russian theater of a brilliant development that was scheduled Pushkin?Is Gogol, the first initiating Russian comedy in the form of entirely exceptional theatrical grotesque, found in the next generations of his successor? Of course not.Lord few carefree about the theater will then talk about the primary importance of Ostrovsky as bytopisatelya Zamoskvoreche Kupchina to the theater so tempting and so acute, willingly betray Gogol oblivion and his enthusiasm will be so wasteful in praise of the theater of everyday life, forget about that grotesque grimaces wax?Film Seduction
. figures of the characters? Gogol. And the fate of Lermontov's theater? Certainly. Scientists criticism and zealous publishers conspired, saying that "Two Brothers" - a youthful work.