It is possible that he is able to get into the skin of another person, the spiritual aspect and mental anguish that I would not ever say out loud, but in private, only by himself. We do not know how to work Aeschylus or Shakespeare.But we. Know that the relationship between the author, who is sitting at home, offers his thoughts on paper, and the world of the theater and the actors become more ephemeral, more and more formal. Best English playwrights born now in the walls of the theater;Uesker, Arden, Osborne, Pinter - if you refer to the most striking example, they not only playwrights, they are directors and actors, and sometimes theater administrators. Yet too few authors - and armchair theorists and actors - whose works, in all honesty, to name or inspirational inspirational.Be playwrights of their destiny, not victims, we should have the right to say that they have betrayed the theater. As things stand, we can say that they betray the theater because of their own inadequacy authors unable to rise to the demands of our time. Of course, there are exceptions:here and there there are brilliant talents. But again I think the broad flow of new original works of film and compare it with the new products for the theater. When new pieces are copying life, we first notice their imitation, and then the fact that they are trying to play;when the play explores the characters, they rarely goes beyond the usual stereotypes; dispute arises, but it rarely reaches the dizzy heights of thought, and even in those cases when it comes to the joys of life, the play does not please us more than literary merit smooth phrases;When critics social evil, the play rarely goes to the heart of social problems, and when the play is created for a laugh, the old hackneyed techniques. As a result, we are often forced to return to life old fire plays as a tribute to the time to put new ones that find neudovletvorntelnymi.You can try to create plays on their own, for example, received a group of writers and actors of the Royal Shekspirskogo theater when it was download the film Trainspotting
and decided to produce the play about Vietnam called it turned out that this play does not exist - improvisation and collective creativity helped remember vacuum.Total load of talented people can lead to more results than attempts interestnoe maloodarennogo one person, but it still did not dokazyvaket. When teamwork is impossible to give the product a real finality can not tie together all of its threads, need not apply for this author.Theoretically, few have such freedom as a playwright. In his power to move grappled the whole world. But in reality, he is surprisingly timid. Watch the film Trainspotting in excellent quality online
. He peers into the life and as we all can see only a tiny piece of the whole - just a piece, and one of its sides captures his imagination.Unfortunately, he rarely makes an attempt to correlate this item with other, larger, as if he was sure that his intuition is infallible. but the fact that he believes reality is our reality.As if the conviction that subjectivity is his weapon and the source of its strength, prevents him grasp the dialectic between what he sees and what he perceives.Noruchaetsya so that one playwright explores the depths and dark corners of the soul, and the other, for which this area is closed, an interest only to the outer sides of life, and everyone thinks that his world - this is the whole world.If it was not Shakespeare, we would have axial evidence that the union of these two playwrights in one person is nearly impossible.