It is an axiom that the artist and the musician should not be Watch Online
and work out a common plan. I do not understand why put the question. Is it not clear that they have to work in the general conception?But when Zavadsky says artist and musician should be taken for the work, after the actors will have to do something, then it's mine, is no good. The artist and musician must also pass the preliminary stage of the work. They are participants in the show.Therefore explication should be communicated to them, too, so that they understand immediately the idea of future performance. Explication, I repeat, it is necessary erotic film. Watch Online
and bang at once. Let the living creature of the actors cast in the role of the director's face, as it was once with me when Apollonsky after my explication of the role gave me and said:"I'm in such cases, not a participant." For a moment I was lost. I was just a kid who could be hit in the face with his boot. And then he was a giant in the theater. But then I was delighted, and now say, let 90% of the actors throw a director in the face. All the better. At least then no misunderstandings will not.Those actors who with me will be erotic film. Watch Online
and work. And it so happens that the actor was silent for various reasons, but my whole soul is opposed. He wants to be free in the evening to act in films, he suffers, but in fact he was not with me.Better such actors immediately leave, but those who remain will heartily given work. III AND January 1939 ... Regarding the face. You said that if the artist starts to seek his face, it turns out that the person he was looking for, and find a face. This idea is very clever, but you upsetting story.Take Lermontov, he began his work with what started tetradochku prostonaprosto and rewrote it poems, which he liked.He rewrote Pushkin and other poets, and then he had the imprudence to rewrite the "Prisoner of the Caucasus" by Pushkin, and when he began to rewrite it became completely invisible to inscribe their own poetry, and ended up that he wrote his own "Prisoner of the Caucasus." What is it, if you take this job Lermontov?If literary approach her - it was the desire to find his face, and he was scared emulating Pushkin found his face. I believe that the question that every director in whatever was searched 449 their creative person looking for his own gait, no one does not seem to be sure to deliver. erotic film.
.This will be the fight against eclecticism, with imitating totally irresponsible. Lermontov, Pushkin imitation, overcoming it is an imitation, sought to remove the shackles of Pushkin. Eichenbaum says that it is has been working on overcoming the beginning of Pushkin's desire to create its own.I gave the example of Lermontov, because it was a real hard worker. ... You are right regarding the inspiration of Pushkin. Of course, you can touch and Pushkin, Pushkin and let them worship, but love Pushkin, I would still be better to speak about the director as an engineer art, he said he was the same engineer, a master in the same shop.