WATCH THE FILM LISA ALISA IN EXCELLENT QUALITY ONLINE
It is useless and establishes a wall between you and the companion. Second warning. Questions should be simple, but not simplistic.Talking about the atomic bomb, we can ask, "Everyone knows that the atomic bomb has caused enormous moral and intellectual issues. But humanity faced with moral dilemmas throughout their history.Given the qualitative leap of the evil that is Hitler's military might and influence of Japanese militarism, whether Oppenheimer human moral and theological point of view, developing the Manhattan Project? ". Could you ask such a question, I managed to resist the temptation.'s All lunacy . best to ask simply:"What are the" for "and" against "the creation of the atomic bomb? Do you think that our attitude to nuclear weapons over time changed". Warning third. Questions should be open, not aimed at a definite answer. I'm starting to get angry when the television journalist begins an interview question "Do you agree with my point of view that ..."Or" Is not it that Roosevelt was the most prominent political figure in the world? "Sometimes you will have a desire to provoke its companion, but it is fraught with unpleasant consequences, it is better not to use these techniques as long as you do not gain sufficient experience. Warning fourth . Avoid interrupting conversation.This is one of the most common shortcomings of interviewers, which only confirms that he is not interested in the answer. In addition, it knocks the pace of conversation and prevents the other party to express themselves. Ethics interview in addition to the four warnings, I would like to touch on philosophy or ethics interview.We are talking about issues such as sensitivity, fairness, politics and propaganda. In the documentary, we use people. Our main excuse is that we use them in the highest order: the fight against corruption, the correction of evil, charity, etc.In the name of social welfare we invade the privacy of others, turn inside out and their souls. At the same time, we use human lives to make money, knowing that the more extravagant and sensational our story, the spectacular and expensive film.It may seem that I am exaggerating, but one interview can change a person's life, it can have consequences that will be felt a long period of time, so the interviewer should be aware of their responsibilities. Here is a brief example.You interview a worker on the farm and pulling out of it the story of the terrible state of the farm. Taking the interview, you can safely leave a comfortable hotel, in a month the film in theaters and the story becomes known to a wider audience. Look online
. Exalted to the heavens as reformatorarevolyutsionera, a great fighter for justice, and the worker is left without income. Another problem that we have already discussed: whether to reopen old wounds and former pain. Again, we often hide behind the guise of the public good, in fact, do this, knowing the pain and suffering - the highest journalistic aerobatics. Often, the main issue is not how the filmed interview, and how it is used in the film.