FILM PAAP KI KAMAEE
The picture is made a master, and it can accept or reject the viewer, but it can not be done the other - nothing either subtract or add narration or annotations.We are here discussing, but that is not of opinion, but in actions. Maybe clarify rules? Hutsieva It's not that clear, it's not clear. Any true work of art can not be absolutely clear, should conceal full of question. The point is not clear, and that is confusing.One such moment for me are the two mothers. Inconsistency and artistic image for me is the same. I should not ask who they are? Who is who? These small trips are very annoying. Artist could free us from it. Much of what has been said here is true.No one denies that our art is massive, but it is impossible to believe that all will understand. Enough that kakayato large group of people understand the picture and give others their experiences. I can not agree with the frame, where Andrew is present in the film. If there is not Tarkovsky, then I interpret these events increasingly significant. I am an artist, not FirstnameLastname.I do not want this picture was about Andrew, that his father left his mother. It is a question of ethics, the issue is very subtle sense and tact. I'm also currently in chemto high, and low chemto opinions, but I do not want you to know about it. I start to ask questions in the level of confession. Hence some questions about the clarity and obscurity.I would like to clarify the deep content in the film, which will lead the audience on its deeper run. If I tell my personal Consistent with the fate of others, then it gets serious. If this push in the film was the story itself from the source, then the value of the picture would be download the film Paap Ki Kamaee
and raised higher, and it would become deeper.I want to add wins and Marlena, who talked about a very loyal things. I also do not like these pictures, really, it narrows the meaning of the picture. Sometimes kartinaispoved, but this confession should be for everyone. But if the thought - I want to be happy - it's only about themselves, for themselves. This narrows.We felt that Tarkovsky talks about things that all of us are very expensive, but then in the final - morality. Arnshtam Talankin do not agree with that frame with the author - a trifle. Any lyrical work becomes public, because it is private, but the photos do not have to apply. Fetovsky very lyrical verse - is common to all.I agree with all the speakers that the picture has a right to exist. Picture of a highly solid, talented. In this sense, we have to have a firm position. Wins and one shot can turn all the wrong semantics. This is art.Qarase to I loved the picture, watched with deep interest, so many things I was deeply touched.
Tarkovsky's picture is really very difficult, peculiar. Power lies not in the thoughts that it laid. Tarkovsky's picture will not be clear and close to numerous people, for many and complex reasons. This is bad.It is a pity that such a great artist, like Tarkovsky, do not feel much, but it is now beyond repair.