Here there is no struggle, there is no thesis, antithesis, not dialectic, but just have an anecdote and a number of "brave" people like Zoshchenko related work with the theater, these anecdotes and they do. And if we say:"We go out with the slogan" Long live the present "- and let's do this slogan for all consonant with that of modernity" - that by looking at what sounded at Theatre MGSPS, we only have to grab hold of her head. This is hardly a revolutionary creation is the theater, we are talking about. That's why I'm feeling it, slyly digress and say:В«Back to Ostrovsky, back to Gogol ', because after all any of us should know that if took the easy way out - to write plays for a few recipes, the play turned out to worthless and it would mean the installation to that audience that comes along with middle-class element, the public, which is nothing to do with the proletariat has no, noparticipation in the construction of the socialist state, or in the creation and promotion of world revolution does not accept, and is engaged only in that sneer at what is zhiltovarischestvo and led zhiltovarischestva is full of this president.If this approach to the proletarian theater, we can see that in general we have the Soviet Union, but there is total zhiltovarischestv and the head of these are zhiltovarischestv kakieto chairmen, house committees, which should be by all means ridiculed.Of course, all this could be funny, because this topic is topical, because everyone has to zhiltovarischestvom kakoenibud chicanery, but it does not follow that we are about to speak dolzh106 HN. Here I should mention the lack of a modern revolutionary repertoire compulsory pathos, without which nothing is happening.Because, for example, when a chemist studying the subject, when he says, "I have as a chemist komuto benefit," - he says with relish manure that must fertilize the land.He talks about it with pleasure, because it has to cross out their profession, if not to understand that as a chemist he komuto should benefit. And the actors do not understand.And by virtue of the fact that we do not seek, do not look at what is being done, with a height bell, and look from the basement is not something that the chairman of the House Committee, and to the ends of his trousers and his shoes - that's why such small things we are doing.I am pleased to say here, on this solemn meeting, because I have to say that the revolution must be tight-knit culture. Again we have to remember Lenin, who always, in every work, put forward the theme of culture. He said that revolution and culture - one.Because of this fact must be download the film Pembalasan ratu pantai selatan
and condemned rousing antics of people who say, "How is this retreat, it's a retreat?"Actually, it all comes down to the fact that they are very short- sighted, and if they are the great values вЂ‹вЂ‹of our culture - Pushkin, Gogol, Ostrovsky, SuhovoKobyli 'On - believe yesterday, from which you just need to brush off his hand, then it is wrong.Need to know how the simplest of ways, in ways that could reveal what Vakhtangov "Wedding" by Chekhov and "The Miracle of St. Anthony" Maeterlinck, when he past today, past, setting the samples bourgeois psychology could a bridge to the future, because he could see in the Each image of social type - like this need to be able to approach thethese things.