The fact that Andrew Arsenevicha here to get too subjective reflection of the events that he takes in the film - something that was not in his literary materials and Bid interpretation of his paintings.It was about life, about how intertwined the fate of his characters as personal fate of a group of people who pass through the film, intertwined with the tragic events of the rainbow and in public life. All this is reflected very pale and unconvincing. There are debates on many counts.Hutsiev said that watching five times now, and I think we saw this picture of a greater number of times. Remind episode associated with military instructor, which caused a lot of controversy and where we have not reached a consensus. How do you say no, but it is certainly is, in essence, distorted reflection of the war, which will still be expensive for everyone.This phenomenon netipichnoeeto absolutely exceptional. We all know this war, and we know how one impulse was engulfed the entire nation - from small to large. You can search for different nuances, but the fact that children are absolute idiots - it is a fact that the military director nerd - that's a fact.And the interpretation of the war was very lean, highly subjective and inaccurate historically. I do not think it is necessary Watch Online
and talk to other episodes - the point of view may be different.But the fact that we had hoped for when you ran this picture, we see a very different interpretation of events and concepts, and ideological saturation paintings waited another. It is certainly not the artist creates for himself, if he does not want his work remained only in his office.In the movie, we are dealing with the work of a mass calculated at least minimally on a significant audience of spectators. In this respect, though Gaidai and says that the film will have its audience - yes, will have, but it will be far from the mass audience. We know that the noise around the picture will be that there will be exalt Andrew - all we know.But millions of viewers will not. And would love to such a talented person would come out to a wide audience, and he could bring a lot of good for his films.Here, I will not reveal a big secret - Tarkovsky has its own point of view, he gave an interview to the Italian newspaper which said that does not necessarily make a movie for a mass audience, can be done for a narrow range. Maybe you can, but is it necessary? This is another question.As for the category, then let's decide how each has developed a look at the picture. Why I'm talking about the second category?Because the Arts Council in its decision not only determines the quality of a particular pattern, but also whether there is a picture in line with the present, whether it meets the basic requirements of the time, whether the tasks facing the cinema studios and the country.
I would be happy if the film will first category. It's not in the picture. But when it comes to large, if not to take the art of the tasks on the implementation of which we are called to work, outstanding picture Tarkovsky can not be called. Proceed to the vote. Discussion over.